Victoria's Secret Just Crushed Nvidia — Here's The BIG Lesson

The Numbers That Made Everyone Do a Double Take

Victoria's Secret generated about $26,600 more per $10,000 invested than Nvidia over a one year period. The dominant AI chip company — one of the most profitable businesses in the history of capitalism — was lapped by a lingerie retailer that most investors had written off.

Before you draw the wrong conclusion from that, here is the full picture. Nvidia's business was so extraordinary that it grew its market capitalization by roughly $875 billion during the same period. Victoria's Secret grew its market cap by approximately $5.2 billion. The difference between percentage return and absolute scale is enormous. Nvidia created more wealth in 12 months than Victoria's Secret's entire market cap times roughly 170. But if you were an individual investor choosing between the 2 stocks a year ago, Victoria's Secret made you vastly more money. That gap is what we are here to understand.

Nvidia's Business Was Extraordinary. Its Stock Wasn't.

Nvidia's financial performance over the past year was genuinely historic. In its fiscal Q2 2027, reported in August 2026, Nvidia posted $96.22 billion in quarterly revenue — up 106% year over year. Data center revenue was $89.0 billion, up 117%. Operating income grew 124% to $63.73 billion. Net income grew 126% to $59.69 billion. Earnings per share of $2.46 were up 128%. The gross margin was 75%.

To put those numbers in perspective: Nvidia now produces roughly 15 times Victoria's Secret's entire annual revenue every single quarter. Nvidia made $59.7 billion in net income in 3 months. Victoria's Secret's entire current market capitalization is approximately $7 billion. These businesses are not remotely comparable in scale or profitability.

And yet the stock returned only about 21% over the past year. The reason is not complicated. One year ago, Nvidia was already trading at approximately 51 times trailing earnings. Investors had already priced in an extraordinary future. For the stock to dramatically outperform, Nvidia did not merely need to be incredible. It needed to be more incredible than a market already paying 51 times earnings had assumed. And during the year, several concerns kept the multiple from expanding: uncertainty around China chip restrictions, debate about whether hyperscaler AI spending could continue accelerating, and the rise of custom silicon from companies like Amazon, Google, and Meta raising questions about long-term market share. None of those concerns stopped the earnings from doubling. They just prevented the valuation multiple from expanding alongside them.

Nvidia went from about 51 times trailing earnings a year ago to roughly 27 times trailing earnings today. The business more than doubled. The multiple nearly halved. The stock went up 21%. That is multiple compression in action — and it is one of the most important forces in investing that most people never fully account for when they look at a great business and assume it will also be a great stock.

Victoria's Secret: From Damaged Brand to Wall Street Darling

One year ago Victoria's Secret was trading at approximately 14 times trailing earnings on a market cap of roughly $1.8 billion. The company had just reported Q2 2025 results showing modest 3% revenue growth, falling operating income, and an anticipated $100 million tariff headwind for the year. The brand had spent several years in retreat — walking away from its traditional identity, cycling through leadership changes, and watching customers drift. Investors were skeptical, short interest was elevated at roughly 19% of publicly available shares, and the consensus view was that the Victoria's Secret brand had been permanently damaged.

Then 2 things changed. First, Hillary Super took over as CEO in September 2024 and did something that sounds simple but turned out to be powerful: she stopped running away from what made Victoria's Secret distinctive. The strategy focused on rebuilding brand authority in bras, reviving PINK, growing beauty, restoring the fashion show, and reducing dependence on promotions in favor of regular-price selling. Less discounting and more brand confidence.

Fiscal 2025 came in better than expected — revenue of $6.553 billion up 5%, comparable sales up 5%, and adjusted EPS of $3.00 growing roughly 22% after normalizing for a prior-year accounting item. Then Q1 2026 blew the doors off everything. Revenue of $1.560 billion was up 15%. Comparable sales were up 13%. Operating income jumped from $20 million to $76 million — nearly 4 times the prior year. Adjusted EPS of $0.60 compared to $0.09 the previous year. Management raised full-year guidance to adjusted EPS of $4.35 to $4.60, up approximately 49% from fiscal 2025. Double-digit new customer acquisition. Increased regular-price selling. Operating leverage that investors had not seen from this business in years.

When those Q1 results were released on June 2, the stock surged nearly 50% in a single session. On the same day the company changed its ticker from VSCO to VSXY — VS Sexy — a symbolic moment that captured exactly what had happened to investor perception. The business had gone from damaged and declining to legitimate and growing, and the market repriced it violently upward. With roughly 19% of shares sold short, short covering amplified the move further. Better fundamentals plus higher valuation multiples plus forced short covering — that is rocket fuel for a small-cap stock.

The Real Lesson: Expectations Are Everything

Here is the investing principle that connects both sides of this story. Stocks do not return what businesses grow. They return the difference between what happens and what was already priced in.

One year ago you had 2 companies. Company A — Nvidia — was already widely regarded as one of the greatest businesses on earth. Revenue was exploding. Margins were extraordinary. The market cap was $4.4 trillion. Investors were paying 51 times trailing earnings. Company B — Victoria's Secret — was viewed as a damaged brand in slow decline. Revenue growth was minimal. Profits were falling. The market cap was $1.8 billion. Investors were paying 14 times trailing earnings.

Then both companies improved. Nvidia improved from extraordinary to historic — revenue doubled, net income doubled, earnings per share up 128%. Victoria's Secret improved from questionable to legitimately good — comparable sales up 13%, operating income nearly quadrupled, EPS guidance up 49%. The first company's improvement was vastly larger in absolute terms. The second company's improvement was vastly larger relative to what investors had expected. And that gap between expectations and reality — not raw business performance — is what drove the stock returns.

One of the most remarkable footnotes in this entire story: after Victoria's Secret's nearly 300% rally, the market currently assigns roughly the same forward earnings multiple to the lingerie retailer as it does to Nvidia. That does not automatically mean Victoria's Secret is overvalued or that Nvidia is cheap. It means the expectations embedded in each stock have completely converged despite the underlying businesses remaining worlds apart. That is how markets work.

Stock Analyzer: VSXY and NVDA

Running the stock analyzer on Victoria's Secret with 5% revenue growth, a 4% profit margin, a 4% free cash flow margin, and a PE and P/FCF of 15, the mid fair value comes out at $57.37 against a current price of $88.12. The implied current price return at the mid scenario is 3.33% annually. After a nearly 300% run in 12 months, the stock analyzer is telling you that most of the good news is now priced in. The business has genuinely improved — but at $88 the market is asking you to pay for perfection from a business with a 4% profit margin and a history of volatility. That is worth taking seriously before adding to a position at current levels.

Running the stock analyzer on Nvidia with 15% revenue growth, a 45% profit margin, a 45% free cash flow margin, and a PE and P/FCF of 25, the mid fair value comes out at $306.53 against a current price of approximately $217.55. The implied current price return at the mid scenario is 13.29% annually. The assumptions are deliberately conservative relative to Nvidia's recent history — 10-year revenue growth has averaged nearly 50% and margins have been even higher — which means the stock analyzer may actually be undervaluing Nvidia if its growth trajectory sustains. At current prices Nvidia appears to offer a reasonable return at mid assumptions, which is a different picture from 12 months ago when it was priced at 51 times earnings.

The punchline of the entire comparison is visible in those 2 numbers. A year ago Victoria's Secret looked cheap on the stock analyzer and Nvidia looked more expensive. Today Victoria's Secret looks expensive and Nvidia looks more reasonable. The market has done exactly what it always does — repriced both businesses to reflect the new reality. The investor who understood this dynamic 12 months ago and bought the cheaper, more hated stock earned 287%. The lesson is not that bad companies beat good companies. It is that price relative to expectations is the variable that determines returns — not business quality alone. Tag me in the community and let's talk about where you see that same setup today.

Disclaimer
Everything Money is Not an Investment Advisor: Everything Money (including Paul, Mo, and Any other person including, but not limited to, other staff members, guests, personalities, etc.) is not an investment adviser, and it is not registered as such with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission or any other state or federal authority under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 or any other law. The investments and strategies discussed in Everything Money’s YouTube videos and on Everythingmoney.com are not and should not be considered investment advice and may not be suitable for you. They do not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situation, needs, or personal circumstances and are not intended to be specific to you. Before acting on any investment or strategy discussed, you should always do your own research and make your own independent decision about whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances. You should also consider seeking advice from your own legal, financial, tax, accounting, or investment advisers. Everything Money does not provide such advice.

READ THE FULL DISCLAIMER HERE: https://everythingmoney.com/disclaimer