Bill Ackman’s New Berkshire? Inside the Transformation of HHH

Bill Ackman has spent much of his career investing in public companies, pushing management teams to improve operations and waiting for the market to recognize the value he sees.

With Howard Hughes Holdings, he is attempting something far more ambitious.

Ackman is no longer simply buying shares in an undervalued business. He is trying to transform Howard Hughes Holdings, or HHH, from a complicated real-estate developer into a diversified, permanent-capital holding company—one that can acquire businesses, reinvest cash across industries and compound intrinsic value per share for decades.

Ackman has openly compared the vision to a modern-day Berkshire Hathaway.

That comparison should not be taken lightly. Berkshire was built over more than half a century through disciplined acquisitions, profitable insurance float, decentralized operations and extraordinary capital allocation. HHH is only beginning that journey.

But after Ackman secured effective control of the company and completed HHH’s first major acquisition, the strategy is no longer theoretical.

The transformation has officially begun.

Why Howard Hughes?

Howard Hughes has always been an unusual company.

Its core assets are large master-planned communities, including developments in Texas, Nevada, Arizona, Maryland and Hawaii. The company owns enormous amounts of land and develops residential communities, office buildings, apartments, retail space and other commercial properties over long periods.

The business can create substantial value, but it is difficult for public-market investors to understand.

Real-estate development is capital intensive. Earnings can be uneven. Land values may take decades to realize. Reported accounting income often fails to capture the increasing value of undeveloped acreage, while higher interest rates can sharply reduce the market’s willingness to pay for long-duration real-estate assets.

Ackman has been involved with Howard Hughes since the company became independent in 2010. Pershing Square participated in the company’s original rights offering and remained its largest shareholder.

Despite the quality of the assets and years of development progress, HHH’s stock performance disappointed.

Ackman estimated that investors who participated in the 2010 rights offering had earned only about a 35% total return through August 2024, including the value of the Seaport Entertainment spinoff. That worked out to roughly 2.2% annually.

The problem, in Ackman’s view, was not necessarily that Howard Hughes had failed to create value. The problem was that the market continued to value it as a complicated and capital-intensive real-estate developer.

His solution was to change what the company could become.

Instead of forcing Howard Hughes to remain a pure-play developer, Ackman proposed using its mature real-estate assets and future cash generation as the foundation for a much broader holding company.

The real-estate subsidiary would continue developing communities. The publicly traded parent would become an acquisition and capital-allocation platform.

The Battle for Control

Ackman’s path to control unfolded through a series of proposals rather than a traditional takeover battle.

In August 2024, Pershing Square disclosed that it was considering acquiring the Howard Hughes shares it did not already own and potentially taking the company private. HHH formed an independent special committee to evaluate and negotiate any proposal.

In January 2025, Ackman offered shareholders an $85-per-share cash election through a proposed merger.

Under that structure, Pershing Square would have invested approximately $1 billion, while HHH would have borrowed another $500 million to repurchase shares. Depending on shareholder elections, Pershing Square’s economic ownership could have risen to more than 60%.

The proposal would have given shareholders an opportunity to cash out, while allowing Ackman to dramatically increase his ownership.

But that was not the final structure.

In February, Ackman withdrew the merger proposal and offered something more favorable to HHH’s long-term strategy: Pershing Square would invest $900 million directly into the company by purchasing 10 million newly issued shares at $90 each.

Instead of paying existing shareholders to leave, the capital would remain inside HHH and could be used for acquisitions.

The special committee rejected the $90 proposal, and negotiations continued.

By May 2025, the parties reached an agreement. Pershing Square purchased nine million newly issued shares at $100 each, injecting $900 million into HHH. The price represented a substantial premium to the company’s previous market price.

Pershing Square’s ownership rose to approximately 46.9%, Ackman became executive chairman and Pershing Square executive Ryan Israel became HHH’s chief investment officer.

Ackman did not receive unrestricted voting control. Pershing Square’s voting power is generally capped at 40%, HHH retained a majority-independent board and certain related-party transactions require additional approval.

Still, there is little doubt about who is now driving the company’s strategic direction.

Ackman gained effective control without buying out minority shareholders or taking HHH private. More importantly, HHH received $900 million of fresh capital to begin building the new holding company.

What Ackman Wants HHH to Become

The long-term plan is straightforward in concept.

Howard Hughes Corporation will continue operating the master-planned-community business. It will develop land, sell homesites, build commercial properties and generate cash as its communities mature.

The parent company will use available capital to acquire controlling interests in businesses outside real estate.

Pershing Square will help source deals, evaluate companies, manage investments and allocate capital. Acquired companies will generally continue operating independently under their existing management teams.

That is the Berkshire Hathaway blueprint: centralized capital allocation and decentralized business operations.

The key advantage is permanent capital.

Pershing Square’s traditional investment funds generally purchase minority stakes in public companies. HHH can pursue transactions those funds cannot. It can buy entire private companies, acquire control positions, hold businesses indefinitely and move capital between subsidiaries.

It can also use a publicly traded parent company to issue debt or equity when attractive opportunities emerge.

The objective is not to maximize quarterly earnings. It is to compound intrinsic value per share over long periods.

The first major test of that strategy is Vantage Group Holdings.

The $2.1 Billion Acquisition of Vantage

Vantage is a specialty insurance and reinsurance company launched in 2020 by Carlyle, Hellman & Friedman and members of its management team.

The company writes insurance across areas including casualty, property, construction, healthcare, professional liability, financial lines, political risk and credit. It also operates a reinsurance business and manages third-party insurance capital through its AdVantage platform.

HHH agreed to acquire Vantage for approximately $2.1 billion in cash. The transaction was announced in December 2025 and completed in June 2026.

At first glance, the acquisition may appear unrelated to Howard Hughes’ real-estate operations.

In reality, insurance is central to Ackman’s holding-company strategy.

Insurance companies collect premiums before many claims are paid. The money held during that period is known as float. When an insurer underwrites profitably, that float can effectively become a low-cost—or even profitable—source of investment capital.

Vantage had approximately $2.8 billion of invested assets when the deal was announced. Most of that portfolio was held in fixed-income securities and cash.

Ackman’s plan is to maintain conservative assets against insurance-loss reserves while gradually investing a portion of Vantage’s surplus capital in equities. Pershing Square will manage the investment portfolio without charging Vantage a separate management fee.

The opportunity is to earn profits from three sources: underwriting, investment income and long-term growth in book value.

What Did HHH Pay?

The $2.1 billion purchase price equaled approximately 1.4 to 1.5 times Vantage’s book value, depending on the measurement date.

For the full year 2025, Vantage generated approximately $1.18 billion in revenue, $178 million in pretax income and $202 million in reported net income. The net-income figure benefited from an income-tax benefit, making pretax income the more conservative measure of normalized profitability.

Based on those results, HHH paid roughly 11.8 times pretax earnings.

The valuation was not obviously cheap, but it was also not excessive if Vantage can achieve the returns Ackman expects.

During the 12 months through September 2025, Vantage reported approximately $1.6 billion of gross written premium, $974 million of net earned premium, $29 million of underwriting profit and $107 million of investment income.

Its combined ratio was 97.1%.

A combined ratio below 100% means the insurer produced an underwriting profit before investment income. At 97.1%, Vantage earned roughly $2.90 of underwriting profit for every $100 of earned premium.

That is profitable, but it is not yet an elite underwriting result.

Vantage’s pretax return on equity was approximately 13%. HHH believes the company can eventually produce high-teens or better returns through improved underwriting, lower expenses, additional scale and stronger investment performance.

That is the heart of the investment thesis.

HHH is buying Vantage at approximately 1.4 to 1.5 times book value while the business earns a low-teens return on equity. If Ackman can lift that return into the high teens, Vantage could compound book value much faster and potentially deserve a valuation above two times book.

HHH could benefit from both earnings growth and multiple expansion.

The Financing Is More Complicated Than It Appears

HHH funded the acquisition with its own cash and $1 billion of preferred equity from Pershing Square Holdings.

That preferred investment helped HHH complete the transaction without placing the entire burden on its common shareholders. However, it also means HHH’s common shareholders do not initially receive all of Vantage’s economics.

HHH can repurchase the preferred investment in tranches over several years. The repurchase price is generally tied to Vantage’s book value, subject to a minimum return for Pershing Square Holdings.

The structure gives HHH time to finance the acquisition while providing Pershing Square Holdings with downside protection and participation in Vantage’s growth.

If Vantage eventually becomes worth substantially more than the preferred redemption formula, buying out Pershing Square’s interest could be accretive to HHH.

Still, minority investors should pay close attention to these related-party arrangements. Pershing Square is HHH’s largest shareholder, strategic adviser and service provider, while an affiliated Pershing vehicle helped finance the Vantage acquisition.

The interests are meaningfully aligned, but they are not identical.

The Bull Case

The optimistic case is compelling.

Howard Hughes owns irreplaceable land in some of the country’s strongest master-planned communities. As these communities mature, they should generate increasing amounts of recurring cash and require less incremental development capital.

Vantage adds profitable underwriting, insurance float and recurring investment income.

Pershing Square adds deal sourcing, investment expertise and a long-term capital-allocation framework.

Together, those pieces could create a powerful compounding machine.

Real-estate cash flow can fund acquisitions. Insurance float can support investment returns. Acquired businesses can generate additional capital that is reinvested across the organization.

Over time, HHH could become dramatically more valuable and diversified than the original real-estate developer.

The Risks

The Berkshire comparison also creates dangerous expectations.

Insurance liabilities can be difficult to estimate, particularly in long-tail casualty lines where claims may take years to develop. Vantage’s current combined ratio is profitable but leaves limited room for reserve mistakes.

Adding more equities to the investment portfolio may improve returns, but it will also increase volatility and could create pressure during market downturns.

HHH may also become harder to value as it adds unrelated businesses. Public markets frequently assign conglomerate discounts to companies with complicated structures and unclear capital allocation.

Ackman must also prove that his success as a public-market investor can translate into acquiring and overseeing entire companies.

Buying good businesses at reasonable prices is only the first step. Berkshire’s record was built through decades of patience, operational discipline and an almost unmatched ability to avoid major permanent losses.

The Real Question

The Vantage acquisition makes one thing clear: Bill Ackman is serious.

Howard Hughes Holdings is no longer merely a real-estate developer with an aspirational investor presentation. It now owns a major insurance platform and has a clearly defined permanent-capital strategy.

The next phase will be measured through results.

Can Vantage lower its combined ratio and consistently produce profitable underwriting? Can Pershing Square improve investment returns without taking excessive risk? Can HHH acquire additional businesses without overpaying, overleveraging or diluting shareholders?

Most importantly, can Ackman compound intrinsic value per share at a rate that justifies the company’s added complexity?

Calling HHH a modern Berkshire Hathaway is easy.

Building one will be much harder.

But for the first time, Ackman has the structure, the capital and the first major operating subsidiary needed to try.

Disclaimer
Everything Money is Not an Investment Advisor: Everything Money (including Paul, Mo, and Any other person including, but not limited to, other staff members, guests, personalities, etc.) is not an investment adviser, and it is not registered as such with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission or any other state or federal authority under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 or any other law. The investments and strategies discussed in Everything Money’s YouTube videos and on Everythingmoney.com are not and should not be considered investment advice and may not be suitable for you. They do not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situation, needs, or personal circumstances and are not intended to be specific to you. Before acting on any investment or strategy discussed, you should always do your own research and make your own independent decision about whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances. You should also consider seeking advice from your own legal, financial, tax, accounting, or investment advisers. Everything Money does not provide such advice.

READ THE FULL DISCLAIMER HERE: https://everythingmoney.com/disclaimer